JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 19, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein

✓Claimant Extrabajadores Del Ingenio Central De Oriente Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Incompetencia De La Corte Para Resolver Peticiones.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para resolver peticiones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente el escrito en el que se formulan una serie de peticiones de carácter laboral presentado por los accionantes, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional carece de competencia para tramitar y resolver directamente las acciones de tutela que llegan a la Corporación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR, por improcedente, el escrito presentado por Extrabajadores del Ingenio Central de Oriente Ltda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.